The Next Six-Figure Domain Sale Could Already Be Sitting in Your Portfolio

WEST PALM BEACH, FL – If someone showed you the domains Kiven.com or Balaena.com without any context, would you consider either one worth nearly $100,000? Many domain investors probably wouldn’t.
For years, conventional wisdom has suggested that the best domains are those with an obvious meaning – names that instantly tell people what a business does or clearly identify a product, service, or industry. It’s advice I’ve shared myself.
Then I looked at the latest DN Journal domain sales report. Among the week’s top reported sales were Kiven.com ($94,888) and Balaena.com ($89,000). Neither is a name that most people would instantly recognize or associate with a particular business. Neither immediately tells you what the business is about. Yet buyers were willing to spend nearly six figures to acquire them.
For most people, including many domain name investors, receiving nearly $100,000 from the sale of a single domain would be a life-changing event. It could eliminate debt, provide the capital to launch a new business, fund a child’s education, or create financial opportunities that simply didn’t exist the day before.
That’s what makes these sales so compelling. Names like Kiven.com and Balaena.com don’t immediately stand out as obvious six-figure candidates, yet buyers were willing to pay substantial sums to acquire them. It raises an intriguing question: Could your own portfolio already contain a domain that someone else sees as the perfect brand?
No one should assume every short, pronounceable domain is destined for a big payday. But these sales are a reminder that the next significant sale isn’t always the domain that most people would instantly recognize or associate with a particular business. Sometimes it’s the distinctive, memorable brand that has quietly sat in a portfolio for years, waiting for the right buyer.
That made me rethink something. Perhaps the first question shouldn’t be, “What does this domain mean?” Instead, it should be, “Could a company build an entire identity around this name?”
There’s an important distinction. Not every made-up domain has value. Thousands of random letter combinations expire every day because they’re awkward, difficult to pronounce, impossible to spell, or simply forgettable.
But short, memorable, pronounceable, and easy-to-spell names occupy a completely different category. They aren’t purchased for what they mean – they’re purchased for what they can become.
Today’s startups often aren’t looking for descriptive keyword domains. In many cases, they assume those names are already taken or financially out of reach. Instead, they’re looking for names that are unique, trademarkable, easy to remember, and capable of becoming a recognizable brand. Before companies like Google, Zillow, Roku, Hulu, and Verizon existed, those names didn’t immediately describe what the businesses did either.
That’s why these recent sales are interesting.
They serve as a reminder that your portfolio’s most valuable domain may not be the name you’ve always considered the most obvious or descriptive. It could be a clean, brandable name you’ve owned for years without giving it much thought.
You never know when your portfolio may be hiding a six-figure asset. The domain you’ve been considering dropping today could become tomorrow’s startup, software platform, or global brand. Sometimes the next six-figure domain sale is already sitting quietly in someone’s portfolio – they just don’t know it yet.

About The Author: John Colascione is Chief Executive Officer of SEARCHEN NETWORKS®. He specializes in Website Monetization, is a Google AdWords Certified Professional, authored a how-to book called ”Mastering Your Website‘, and is a key player in several online businesses.
Add STRATEGIC REVENUE as a Google Preferred Source to see more of our business, technology, and digital strategy coverage in Google Search.
Add Strategic RevenueYou can now select the categories you're interested in and receive email updates when new articles are published in only those topics.



You’re right, John, that arbitrary and fanciful marks can definitely make for a strong trademark. And I say this as someone who doesn’t have any such names in my portfolio.
But that’s also why I’m consistently puzzled at the high valuations place on acronyms, because other than IBM, HP, and a few others, they’re extremely difficult to ‘brand’ – and even more difficult to defend in a TM dispute.