• Home
  • Domains
  • Internet & Tech
  • Security & Privacy
  • Google & Search
  • Editorial Praise
  • Contact

Strategic Revenue - Domain and Internet News

Internet news authored by John Colascione

Register Domain Names

  • Isn’t Print Dead?
  • Killer Acquisition
  • New gTLD Death
  • Online Censorship
  • Semantic Indexing
  • You’re A Loser
You are here: Home / Domain Names / Debunked: Why Do People Still Believe “Domain Name Age” Matters for SEO?

Debunked: Why Do People Still Believe “Domain Name Age” Matters for SEO?

July 11, 2019 By John Colascione 5 Comments

*** Here Is A List Of Some Of The Best Domain Name Resources Available ***

Register Domain Names

PALM BEACH – I stumbled on a post today about “domain age” and SEO and how it is a long debunked “myth” that domain name age matters when it comes to SEO, and that of course, it does not. But where did this (if even) false believe originate from to begin with?? Why do webmasters and domainers believe that domain age plays a role at all? Where did this myth come from? And was its source even reliable?

It came from the horse’s mouth when Google filed its patent for “DOCUMENT SCORING BASED ON DOCUMENT CONTENT UPDATE” at the time they applied for exclusive use of certain patentable methods and processes back in 2011. By 2012 I took a deep dive into this patent and the “domain age myth” when it was detailed in several sections where Google discussed “domain legitimacy”.

In section 94, Google discusses measuring the “legitimacy” of a domain name and how it could affect search rankings:

[0094] In summary, search engine 125 may generate (or alter) a score associated with a document based, at least in part, on information relating to a “legitimacy of a domain” associated with the document.

In section 91, they explain why a domains registration period should be used as a measure of “legitimacy”

[0091] Certain signals may be used to distinguish between illegitimate and legitimate domains. For example, domains can be renewed up to a period of 10 years. Valuable (legitimate) domains are often paid for several years in advance, while doorway (illegitimate) domains rarely are used for more than a year. Therefore, the date when a domain expires in the future can be used as a factor in predicting the legitimacy of a domain and, thus, the documents associated therewith.

Although the above discusses the ‘length of registration‘ going forward (time left to expire), ‘age’ is a likely criteria as touched on in section 93.

[0093] Also, or alternatively, the age, or other information, regarding a name server associated with a domain may be used to predict the legitimacy of the domain. A “good” name server may have a mix of different domains from different registrars and have a history of hosting those domains, while a “bad” name server might host mainly pornography or doorway domains, domains with commercial words (a common indicator of spam), or primarily bulk domains from a single registrar, or might be brand new. The newness of a name server might not automatically be a negative factor in determining the legitimacy of the associated domain, but in combination with other factors, such as ones described herein, it could be.

As with their summery of these examples, these are the “types” [0094] of things being measured and analysed when it comes to a domain name and its history as well as its historical ranking factors [0096] [0098] [0099] which could only be measured with time associated with a domain.

[0098] In addition to history of positions (or rankings) of documents for a given query, search engine 125 may monitor (on a page, host, document, and/or domain basis) one or more other factors, such as the number of queries for which, and the rate at which (increasing/decreasing), a document is selected as a search result over time; seasonality, burstiness, and other patterns over time that a document is selected as a search result; and/or changes in scores over time for a URL-query pair.

The document includes scores more references and sections which mention “domain-related information” or using “a combination, of the types of history data”.

[0118] Search engine 125 may obtain history data associated with the identified documents (act 420). As described above, the history data may take different forms. For example, the history data may include data relating to document inception dates; document content updates/changes; query analysis; link-based criteria; anchor text; traffic; user behavior; domain-related information; ranking history; user maintained/generated data (e.g., bookmarks and/or favorites); unique words, bigrams, and phrases in anchor text; linkage of independent peers; and/or document topics. Search engine 125 may obtain one, or a combination, of these kinds of history data.

To read the entire patent with my comments and opinions on these methods click here.

Now this does not prove that Google is using domain age as a ranking factor today, but it sure does indicate that they thought it would be a good idea in the past, and if detailed in this patent application, they where more than likely using it as a ranking factor at one time.

John Colascione
John Colascione

About The Author: John Colascione is Chief Executive Officer of Internet Marketing Services Inc. He specializes in Website Monetization, is a Google AdWords Certified Professional, authored a ‘how to’ book called ”Mastering Your Website‘, and is a key player in several Internet related businesses through his search engine strategy brand Searchen Networks®

Filed Under: Domain Names Tagged With: .google, Document Content, Document Scoring, Domain Age, Domain Age Myth, Domain Legitimacy, Domain Name, Domain Names, Domain Ranking, Domainers, Domains, Google Rankings, Legitimacy, Legitimate, Myth, Ranking Factor, Rankings, Search Rankings, SEO, Webmasters

*** Here Is A List Of Some Of The Best Domain Name Resources Available ***

Register Domain Names

Comments

  1. Jay says

    July 11, 2019 at 11:37 am

    I didn’t read the first guys blog, but actually [0091] does not state domain AGE does or will play a role at all, it only talks about time before expiry.

    Reply
    • Jay says

      July 11, 2019 at 11:39 am

      Another moderated blog. And you guys wonder why no one posts. People want results, not to wait around while someone dicks around with their posts.

      Reply
      • John Colascione says

        July 11, 2019 at 11:50 am

        Instant gratification? It’s not a forum. If you had posted at least once before and were approved to appear, your comment should not have been moderated.

        Reply
    • John Colascione says

      July 11, 2019 at 11:48 am

      You’re absolutely right. It discusses the ‘length of registration’, indicating they are looking at the time left to expire, going forward and not necessarily its ‘age’ from ‘initial’ registration. I believe I have seen it there somewhere. I will dig deeper and see if I find the reference to time ‘since’ registration. I believe this is covered and supported in other areas of the patent such as [0093] (age of name-server) and [0096] [0098] [0099] (historical ranking factors). However, as mentioned, The patent includes scores more references which mention “domain-related information” or using “a combination, of the types of history data”.

      Reply
  2. Antonio Ormachea says

    July 11, 2019 at 5:22 pm

    Today’s news is a great contribution to the domain community. Some brokers take advantage of the domain’s age to lower the offering price.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Search This Site

by: John Colascione

John Colascione

Logo
John Colascione is Chief Executive of Internet Marketing Services Inc. He specializes in Website Monetization, authored a book called Mastering Your Website, and is a key player in several Internet businesses through his brand SEARCHEN®

The Published Reporter

The Published Reporter

Fellow Me

Twitter

In The News

  • DNJournal: New Book From Veteran Domainer
  • From Brandable to Exact-Match Geo Domain
  • InnovateLI: Two Deals, One Very Interesting Digital
  • Internet Commerce Association: John Colascione
  • NamesCon: Featured Attendee: John Colascione
  • Long Island Media Inc, SmartCEO, Future 50
  • Speakers, Name Summit, John Colascione
  • Speakers, Real Estate Summit, John Colascione
  • 24 Leading Domain Experts Analyze 2017

Popular Stories

New gTLD? Not So Fast; History Suggests New ‘Right of the Dots’ Could = Total Failure

Could Domain Investing Industry End with Legal Provision for Domain “Hoarding”

Does the Domain Industry Suffer From Own Versions of Trumpted “Fake News” Stories?

Websites and Domain Names to Become Insignificant within 20 Years or Less

List of 300+ Cryptocurrency Domain Name Sales and Sale Prices [All Time] (NameBio)

Quotes to Follow

quote icon The domain name is equivalent to Gold. It is the only packaged item which is globally tax-free, portable, with value that is universal across different cultures. quote icon – Frank Schilling

quote icon Domains have and will continue to go up in value faster than any other commodity ever known to man. quote icon – Rick Schwartz

quote icon  Google knows you, your friends, your likes, what entertains you, where you are in the world at any given time. Google will soon predict your next action, your next thought, based on a collaboration of thoughts past. quote icon – John Colascione

Like These Headlines?

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

T.L.D. Brokerage

Domain Brokers

Domain Reseller

Leaving Cash On The Table? Join The Best Domain Reseller Program (discounts + revenue)

Recent SEDO Weekly Sales List Includes “LLL.org” Domain Name Sale for $35,000

PALM BEACH, FL – According to the latest SEDO.com weekly domain sales report, the three letter “LLL” web address "FTP.org" just sold for $35,000.00. Other recent sales of “LLL.org” … [Read More...]

GOOG To Follow FB With Restrictions On Housing, Employment, and Credit Ads

WEST PALM BEACH, FL - Usually Google is a leader in all things advertising, however, a recent update to policy by GOOG (NASDAQ) will have it following Facebook (FB) where the ad giant will implement … [Read More...]

Data Breach: Unauthorized Party Accessed DoorDash Customer Information

SAN FRANCISCO, CA - According to recent reports, a new data security incident has surfaced. DoorDash, a popular food delivery app, detected suspicious activity from the computer network of a … [Read More...]

Domaining blog recommended by Domaining.com
Copyright © 2010-2021 StrategicRevenue.com - Property of Internet Marketing Services Inc.   FeedBurner: RSS   RSS
By using this site you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy. If you do not agree, please exit the service.