• Home
  • Domains
  • Internet & Tech
  • Security & Privacy
  • Google & Search
  • Editorial Praise
  • Contact

Strategic Revenue - Domain and Internet News

Internet news authored by John Colascione

Register Domain Names

  • Isn’t Print Dead?
  • Killer Acquisition
  • New gTLD Death
  • Online Censorship
  • Semantic Indexing
  • You’re A Loser
You are here: Home / Domain Names / There’s Pork In That Bill; DNA’s HDI Overreaching with Registry Handling of Copyright Infringement

There’s Pork In That Bill; DNA’s HDI Overreaching with Registry Handling of Copyright Infringement

February 10, 2017 By John Colascione Leave a Comment

*** Here Is A List Of Some Of The Best Domain Name Resources Available ***

Register Domain Names

NEW YORK, NY – The Domain Name Association (DNA), a new non-profit association “supposedly” (I just learned about them) representing the interests of the domain name industry, is suggesting in its “Healthy Domain Initiative” (HDI) four objectives for registry and registrars to participate in voluntary actions which are intended to protect and advance the evolution of the domain name system.

Again, I use the word “supposedly” only because I just recently heard of this organization (EFF also refers to them “relatively new”) and one of these four objectives seems to place registries and registrars in an unusual position – to intervene or determine the level of abuse or legality of copyright infringement incidents (of their customers) – a highly complex and troublesome initiative that does not belong outside of the hands of the already adequate legal processes of law.

Appendix D: Voluntary Third Party Handling of Copyright: The purpose of adoption and implementation of a Copyright Alternative Dispute Resolution Policy (“Copyright ADRP”) is to provide a legally effective and efficient mechanism mitigating pervasive instances of copyright infringement in the DNS, while ensuring that Registrants’ due process rights are observed. This document provides recommendations to Registry Operators as to how to structure and implement a Copyright ADRP should they elect to do so.  

In other words, the Domain Name Association supports the creation of a process similar to the Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP), for handling trademark violations which would be called an Alternative Dispute Resolution Policy (ADRP). This policy, in short, would be created to better and more quickly facilitate the taking or confiscating of a domain name from its registrant. Wonderful.

I don’t believe this should be of any concern to the registrar, in part, because as mentioned in the HDI Introduction and Context document “Registry Operators are not jurists or experts in Copyright law and are not in a position to admit and evaluate evidence.” Enough said. Registries and registrars should not be involved in the process at all and Copyright infringement issues should be left to the courts to mitigate and determine along with its hefty civil fines and criminal remedies.

What the domain industry does not need is more red-tape.

There are seven (7) recommendations for Registry operators to follow in the event they choose to participate in this new fourth part of the Healthy Domain Name initiative – but let’s look at recommendation number five (5).

The Copyright ADRP should have limited remedies available.  No monetary damages or relief beyond suspending, locking or transferring the domain name [to the complainant] should be available.

In what instance would the registry decide it necessary to “transfer the domain name”?

According to the Internet Commerce Association (ICA): An adverse ruling against the domain registrant would result in “cancellation of registration or transfer to Complainant”. A fuller explanation in the background paper posits that the aim of this “Copyright Alternative Dispute Resolution Policy (“Copyright ADRP”) is to provide a legally effective and efficient mechanism mitigating pervasive instances of copyright infringement in the DNS, while ensuring that Registrants’ due process rights are observed”.

This fourth provision of the Healthy Domain Name initiative seems far out-of-reach of what is necessary to protect and advance the evolution of the domain name system. The HDI announced itself by publishing the “first set” of recommended healthy practices, grouped into four areas total:

  1. online security abuse (Appendix A: Security Threat Mitigation Proposal);
  2. child abuse mitigation (Appendix B: Child Abuse Content Mitigation Proposal);
  3. complaint handling from illegal online pharmacies (Appendix C: Rogue Pharmacy Abuse Report Proposal);
  4. online copyright infringement (Appendix D: Voluntary Third Party Handling of Copyright Infringement Cases)

The first, second and third parts are probably fine when it comes to protecting and advancing the evolution of the domain name system, but where does this online copyright infringement suggestion come from? And who determines if the content in question is in fact, “pervasively infringing”, the registry itself – a group of registry administrators on a panel?  The registry should not be involved at all; just as they should not be named as a party under a Copyright ADRP – just leave them out of it completely.

Copyright law is a house of cards. New rules have been added on top of old rules which contradict overlap and confuse most people. Then add on the Fair Use principle, another complex multi-part mess that nobody who’s not a lawyer understands. The loss of domain name should not be anywhere near this topic. The Healthy Domain Initiative reminds me of pork-barrel politics where you’ve got a good bill you’re trying to pass, but you can’t gather enough support for it (from the other side) unless you cram one awful provision in there to get it done.

  1. https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2017/02/healthy-domains-initiative-censorship-through-shadow-regulation
  2. http://domainincite.com/21517-the-pirate-bay-likely-to-be-sunk-as-org-adopts-udrp-for-copyright
  3. http://www.thedna.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/DNA_Healthy_Practices_2017.pdf
  4. http://www.thedna.org/domain-name-association-outlines-healthy-practices-part-key-initiative/
  5. http://www.internetcommerce.org/dna-unveils-hdi-with-copyright-udrp/
  6. http://www.circleid.com/posts/20170207_domain_name_association_outlines_healthy_practices/

UPDATE: 2/23/2017

Washington Internet Daily

Public Interest Registry said it will indefinitely pause “further development” of its planned Sys­temic Copyright Infringement Alternative Dispute Resolution Policy (SCDRP) amid stakeholder scrutiny. PIR, the domain registry for the .org top-level domain, was developing SCDRP in concert with the Do­main Name Association’s development of its Copyright Alternative Dispute Resolution Policy, a voluntary third-party mechanism akin to ICANN’s trademark-centric uniform dispute resolution policy that would address copyright infringement through the use of domain names (see 1702080085). The Electronic Fron­tier Foundation and Internet Commerce Association were among stakeholders criticizing DNA’s proposal and seeking further information on PIR’s plans (see 1702100054 and 1702170058). PIR said Thursday it paused development of SCDRP to “reflect on those concerns and consider forward steps.”

John Colascione
John Colascione

About The Author: John Colascione is Chief Executive Officer of Internet Marketing Services Inc. He specializes in Website Monetization, is a Google AdWords Certified Professional, authored a ‘how to’ book called ”Mastering Your Website‘, and is a key player in several Internet related businesses through his search engine strategy brand Searchen Networks®

Filed Under: Domain Names Tagged With: ADRP, Alternative, Association, Copyright, DNA, DNS, Domain, Domain Name, Domain Names, Due Process, Evolution, Fair Use, Infringement, Law, Lawsuit, Lawyer, Legally, Mitigating, Non-profit, Organization, Organizations, Pervasive, Politics, Registrars, Registry, Trademark, Trademarks

*** Here Is A List Of Some Of The Best Domain Name Resources Available ***

Register Domain Names

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Search This Site

by: John Colascione

John Colascione

Logo
John Colascione is Chief Executive of Internet Marketing Services Inc. He specializes in Website Monetization, authored a book called Mastering Your Website, and is a key player in several Internet businesses through his brand SEARCHEN®

The Published Reporter

The Published Reporter

Fellow Me

Twitter

In The News

  • DNJournal: New Book From Veteran Domainer
  • From Brandable to Exact-Match Geo Domain
  • InnovateLI: Two Deals, One Very Interesting Digital
  • Internet Commerce Association: John Colascione
  • NamesCon: Featured Attendee: John Colascione
  • Long Island Media Inc, SmartCEO, Future 50
  • Speakers, Name Summit, John Colascione
  • Speakers, Real Estate Summit, John Colascione
  • 24 Leading Domain Experts Analyze 2017

Popular Stories

New gTLD? Not So Fast; History Suggests New ‘Right of the Dots’ Could = Total Failure

Could Domain Investing Industry End with Legal Provision for Domain “Hoarding”

Does the Domain Industry Suffer From Own Versions of Trumpted “Fake News” Stories?

Websites and Domain Names to Become Insignificant within 20 Years or Less

List of 300+ Cryptocurrency Domain Name Sales and Sale Prices [All Time] (NameBio)

Quotes to Follow

quote icon The domain name is equivalent to Gold. It is the only packaged item which is globally tax-free, portable, with value that is universal across different cultures. quote icon – Frank Schilling

quote icon Domains have and will continue to go up in value faster than any other commodity ever known to man. quote icon – Rick Schwartz

quote icon  Google knows you, your friends, your likes, what entertains you, where you are in the world at any given time. Google will soon predict your next action, your next thought, based on a collaboration of thoughts past. quote icon – John Colascione

Like These Headlines?

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

T.L.D. Brokerage

Domain Brokers

Domain Reseller

Leaving Cash On The Table? Join The Best Domain Reseller Program (discounts + revenue)

Recent SEDO Weekly Sales List Includes “LLL.org” Domain Name Sale for $35,000

PALM BEACH, FL – According to the latest SEDO.com weekly domain sales report, the three letter “LLL” web address "FTP.org" just sold for $35,000.00. Other recent sales of “LLL.org” … [Read More...]

GOOG To Follow FB With Restrictions On Housing, Employment, and Credit Ads

WEST PALM BEACH, FL - Usually Google is a leader in all things advertising, however, a recent update to policy by GOOG (NASDAQ) will have it following Facebook (FB) where the ad giant will implement … [Read More...]

Data Breach: Unauthorized Party Accessed DoorDash Customer Information

SAN FRANCISCO, CA - According to recent reports, a new data security incident has surfaced. DoorDash, a popular food delivery app, detected suspicious activity from the computer network of a … [Read More...]

Domaining blog recommended by Domaining.com
Copyright © 2010-2021 StrategicRevenue.com - Property of Internet Marketing Services Inc.   FeedBurner: RSS   RSS
By using this site you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy. If you do not agree, please exit the service.